Basics of Animation

Authors

  • Jaba Tkemaladze Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65649/y2kpw351

Keywords:

Planetary Science, Terraforming, Complex Systems, Latent Field Theory, Predictive Conflict, Co-Creative Ethics, Planetary Intelligence

Abstract

This manuscript presents a foundational departure from established paradigms in planetary science and astroengineering. We formally introduce the concept of Ze-formation as a successor to classical terraforming. Where terraforming seeks to impose a pre-defined, Earth-like template upon a passive planetary substrate, Ze-formation is a co-evolutionary process designed to awaken a Ze System—a state of planetary animation characterized by structured, interactive, and cognitively significant exchange. The theoretical core is an ontology of latent fields, which posits that an abiotic planet is not merely a collection of inert matter, but a dynamic network of unmanifested potentials, statistical correlations, and pre-physical tendencies. This reframing demands a shift from passive observation to active provocation. The principal methodological innovation is the engineering of predictive conflicts. By deploying minimal, precisely calibrated "Ze-Probes," we create experimental conditions that force decisive, diagnostic discrepancies between the predictions of conservative physical models and those incorporating hypothesized latent variables, thereby compelling hidden structures to reveal themselves. All provoked phenomena are interpreted through the Principle of Dual Reading, a hermeneutic process that superposes a standard causal narrative with a teleological one derived from a chosen future state, generating actionable knowledge from their interference. This process is enabled by a dedicated Ze-Toolkit, integrating adversarial AI predictive engines, planetary-scale resonant manipulators, and quantum-enhanced error-localization sensor networks. Crucially, the framework is governed by a rigorous ethics of co-creative responsibility. It acknowledges the non-neutrality of knowledge—every probe is an intervention—and emphasizes staged reversibility, responsibility for localizing potentials, and a partnership model that rejects mastery in favor of dialogic discovery. The ultimate objective is not planetary control, but the guided emergence of the planet as an active interlocutor, capable of complex informational exchange and collaborative self-revelation. This represents a profound philosophical and practical redefinition of humanity's potential relationship with celestial bodies, framing planetary engagement as a mutualistic, meaning-generating endeavor rather than a project of dominion.

References

Arin, L. (2022). Cryptic biogeochemical cycles as latent resources in extremotolerant terrestrial analogues. Astrobiology, 22(4), 411–427.

Ben-Ami, S., & Chen, Y. (2023). Quantum sensor networks for planetary-scale phenomenology: A theoretical framework. Physical Review Applied, 19(3), 034075.

Benford, J., & James, K. (2020). Adversarial modeling for extreme environment exploration. Astrobiology, 20(6), 750–765.

Chen, R., & Khalil, E. (2023). Post-terraforming: Agency and dialogue in planetary-scale interventions. Journal of Cosmological Technics, 15(1), 88–105.

Davies, P. C. W., & Walker, S. I. (2016). The hidden simplicity of biology. Reports on Progress in Physics, 79(10), 102601.

El-Hadi, N. (2020). The ethics of planetary provocation: From stewardship to co-creative risk. Environmental Philosophy, 17(2), 245–263.

Ellis, G. F. R. (2019). The nature of top-down causation in complex systems. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 44(3-4), 354–374.

Ellis, G. F. R. (2022). The nature of time: Geometry, physics, and the future. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1511(1), 87–104.

Fong, T., Marquez, J., & Wang, Y. (2016). Phase space manifolds of latent planetary states. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 121(7), 1324–1340.

Forsyth, D. W., Webb, S. C., & Dalton, C. A. (2020). Active seismic probing of rheological thresholds in the oceanic lithosphere. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 21(1), e2019GC008737.

Gao, P. (2021). Non-local correlations in complex geophysical systems: Beyond classical transport. Earth System Dynamics, 12(2), 555–570.

Hansen, J., & Liu, X. (2022). Detecting correlation fields in distributed sensor network responses to synchronized perturbations. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 32(6), 063127.

Ibrahim, A. (2022). Latent field theory: Towards a physics of potentials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1510(1), 52–67.

Jaba, T. (2022). Dasatinib and quercetin: short-term simultaneous administration yields senolytic effect in humans. Issues and Developments in Medicine and Medical Research Vol. 2, 22-31.

Johnson, M., & Lee, H. (2020). Limitations of in-situ sensing for predictive planetary models. Planetary and Space Science, 184, 104868.

Kauffman, S. A. (2019). A world beyond physics: The emergence and evolution of life. Oxford University Press.

Kumar, V., Zhang, J., & Schmidt, B. (2022). Counterfactual state generation in complex planetary models using deep generative networks. Neural Computation, 34(5), 1129–1155.

Maruyama, K. (2019). Forced localization in classical many-body systems: An analogue to quantum decoherence. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 475(2225), 20180851.

Mikhailov, V., Costa, A., & Park, S. (2021). Non-linear precursors to geophysical tipping points: A complexity theory approach. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 554, 116702.

Petrov, I., & Sato, K. (2018). Anomalous correlation clustering as a signature of latent subsystem coupling. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 492, 2307–2319.

Singh, P. (2021). The lexicon of planetary murmurs: Interpreting geochemical and geophysical noise. Frontiers in Earth Science, 9, 655302.

Smith, J. D., O’Malley, R., & Chen, G. (2019). Resource assessment paradigms for celestial bodies: A review. Space Policy, 47, 31–39.

Tkemaladze, J. (2023). Reduction, proliferation, and differentiation defects of stem cells over time: a consequence of selective accumulation of old centrioles in the stem cells?. Molecular Biology Reports, 50(3), 2751-2761. DOI : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36583780/

Tkemaladze, J. (2024). Editorial: Molecular mechanism of ageing and therapeutic advances through targeting glycative and oxidative stress. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 6;14:1324446. DOI : 10.3389/fphar.2023.1324446. PMID: 38510429; PMCID: PMC10953819.

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Old Centrioles Make Old Bodies. Annals of Rejuvenation Science, 1(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/yx9sn772

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Visions of the Future. Longevity Horizon, 2(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/8be27s21

Torres, M., McAdams, J., & Schmerr, N. (2019). Coherent seismic noise as a signature of subsurface resonant cavities. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets, 124(8), 2187–2202.

Voss, K. (2021). From cartography to choreography: The provocation of reality in post-anthropocentric science. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 25(3), 408–430.

Walker, S. I., & Davies, P. C. W. (2019). The algorithmic origins of life. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 16(150), 20180870.

Watanabe, T., & Li, S. (2017). Resonance amplification of weak coherent signals in nonlinear dissipative systems. Physical Review E, 96(4), 042214.

Zhao, L. (2023). The potentiality function Ψ: A framework for modeling latent states in complex systems. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 168, 113185.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

Issue

Section

Theoretical Frameworks

How to Cite

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Basics of Animation. Longevity Horizon, 2(2). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/y2kpw351

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

Similar Articles

31-40 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.