Spelt vs Wheat

Authors

  • Jaba Tkemaladze Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65649/31dg4t74

Keywords:

Spelt, Celiac Disease, Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity, Gluten Immunogenicity

Abstract

Spelt (Triticum aestivum ssp. spelta) is frequently marketed as a more tolerable alternative to common wheat, particularly for individuals with gluten-related disorders. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of the gluten from spelt and modern wheat (Triticum aestivum ssp. vulgare) and its biological impact. Using standardized flour samples grown under identical conditions, we performed proteomic characterization, assessed immunoreactivity via ELISA with monoclonal and celiac disease (CeD) patient sera, evaluated effects on intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) barrier function and immune cell activation, and conducted a pilot randomized cross-over trial in subjects with non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS). Results revealed that spelt gluten has a distinct proteomic signature with a lower relative abundance of specific immunogenic gliadins, leading to 15-25% lower immunoreactivity. In vitro, spelt peptides induced a slower and weaker disruption of epithelial tight junctions and a reduced pro-inflammatory cytokine release. In the NCGS trial, 60% of participants reported milder symptoms after spelt consumption compared to wheat, though objective inflammatory markers did not differ significantly. We conclude that while the quantitative and qualitative differences in spelt gluten attenuate its pathogenicity, it remains unsafe for individuals with CeD due to the presence of cross-reactive epitopes. For a subset of those with NCGS, spelt may be better tolerated, warranting a personalized dietary approach.

References

., Koehler, P., & Scherf, K. A. (2017). Isolation and characterization of gluten protein types from wheat, rye, barley and oats for use as reference materials. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0172819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172819

Shan, L., Molberg, Ø., Parrot, I., Hausch, F., Filiz, F., Gray, G. M., Sollid, L. M., & Khosla, C. (2002). Structural basis for gluten intolerance in celiac sprue. Science, 297(5590), 2275–2279. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1074129

Shewry, P. R. (2019). What is gluten—Why is it special? Frontiers in Nutrition, 6, 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2019.00101

Shewry, P. R., Hawkesford, M. J., Piironen, V., Lampi, A. M., Gebruers, K., Boros, D., ... & Rakszegi, M. (2020). Natural variation in grain composition of wheat and related cereals. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 68(32), 8307-8318. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02325

Sollid, L. M., Tye-Din, J. A., Qiao, S.-W., Anderson, R. P., Gianfrani, C., & Koning, F. (2020). Update 2020: nomenclature and listing of celiac disease–relevant gluten epitopes recognized by CD4+ T cells. Immunogenetics, 72(1-2), 85–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00251-019-01141-w

Sturgeon, C., & Fasano, A. (2016). Zonulin, a regulator of epithelial and endothelial barrier functions, and its involvement in chronic inflammatory diseases. Tissue Barriers, 4(4), e1251384. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2016.1251384

Tkemaladze, J. (2023). Reduction, proliferation, and differentiation defects of stem cells over time: a consequence of selective accumulation of old centrioles in the stem cells?. Molecular Biology Reports, 50(3), 2751-2761. DOI : https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36583780/

Tkemaladze, J. (2024). Editorial: Molecular mechanism of ageing and therapeutic advances through targeting glycative and oxidative stress. Front Pharmacol. 2024 Mar 6;14:1324446. DOI : 10.3389/fphar.2023.1324446. PMID: 38510429; PMCID: PMC10953819.

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Old Centrioles Make Old Bodies. Annals of Rejuvenation Science, 1(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/yx9sn772

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Visions of the Future. Longevity Horizon, 2(1). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/8be27s21

Tye-Din, J. A., Galipeau, H. J., & Agardh, D. (2022). Celiac disease: A review of current concepts in pathogenesis, prevention, and novel therapies. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 10, 1051521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1051521

Zevallos, V. F., Raker, V., Tenzer, S., Jimenez-Calvente, C., Ashfaq-Khan, M., Rüssel, N., ... & Schuppan, D. (2017). Nutritional wheat amylase-trypsin inhibitors promote intestinal inflammation via activation of myeloid cells. Gastroenterology, 152(5), 1100-1113.e12. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.006

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

Issue

Section

In Silico Experimentation

How to Cite

Tkemaladze, J. (2026). Spelt vs Wheat. Longevity Horizon, 2(4). DOI : https://doi.org/10.65649/31dg4t74

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.